Can Christians embrace faith and science?

2 comments

Faith and science, Genesis’ creation story vs. theory of evolution — is it possible for Christians to embrace and believe in both?

 

May 25 marked the anniversary of the indictment of John Scopes, a science teacher in Tennessee, who was put on trial for teaching Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. The famous 1925 trial was a lightning rod that pitted religion against science. That flame still burns hot today.

 

Since Jan. 1, 2011, legislators in seven states — including Tennessee— have introduced nine bills attacking evolution education. The Tennessee bill calls evolution and global warming “scientific controversies” and suggests teachers should “help students understand, analyze, critique and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories.”

 

Other states considering similar bills are Florida, Texas, Missouri, Kentucky, Oklahoma and New Mexico.

 

Louisiana legislators are fighting to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act passed in 2008, which allows the introduction of non-scientific material into school curriculums. Hundreds of students and professors, including more than 40 Nobel Laureates, have signed petitions and resolutions in support of the repeal.

 

Chaos and order

 

In the beginning, God created order out of chaos. Every branch of science starts with the hypothesis that the universe is lawful and orderly. So why is there so much chaos in the minds of so many about how the world was formed?

 

“The concept of biological evolution is the fundamental cornerstone — the glue, so to speak — that binds together the biological sciences,” said Al Kuelling, a member of First Wayne Street United Methodist Church, Fort Wayne, Ind. “Evolution is also practically important for things held dear to religion. Humans use evolution daily to understand disease, create pharmaceuticals, increase agricultural yields and much more.”

 

Delegates to The United Methodist Church’s 2008 General Conference, the denomination’s top lawmaking body, passed three petitions clarifying the denominational position regarding evolution. Kuelling, who retired from a career in physics, wrote two of the petitions.

 

The addition states in part: “We find science’s descriptions of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution are not in conflict with theology.”

 

Many United Methodists agree that the study of evolution can be complementary with Christian faith.

 

“The church in the last 2,000 years has felt the need to rigidly ‘defend’ narrow propositions as the only truth — ignoring that Jesus himself taught by the use of parables and of asking questions,” said the Rev. Paul J. Kottke, pastor at University Park United Methodist Church, Denver. “In order for the church to serve a healing and empowering role in the 21st century, we must let go of the arrogance that only the church speaks for God.”

 

Peace, poverty and the planet

 

Minnesota Area Bishop Sally Dyck and Sarah Ehrman have co-authored “A Hopeful Earth: Faith, Science, and the Message of Jesus.” Dyck writes in the introduction that the idea of the book began when Ehrman, her niece and a high school science teacher, asked her what The United Methodist Church was doing about the environment.

 

After many conversations, Dyck concluded, “It is a critical time for the church to take a lead in addressing the issues and the connections between peace, poverty and the planet.”

 

The book is offered as “a bridge between the scientific world and the faith community,” she said.

 

To focus on whether God or science created life is to miss the point, Ehrman said.

 

“To ostracize a group of people as large as those that are science-minded because there are disagreements on a variety of topics is damaging to the science and faith community. To exclude those from the table who are different, or believe differently, does not seem Christlike to me. I think that the balance between the two groups can lead to better decision-making ... decisions that are more research-based but ethically and morally considered as well,” she said.

 

“God gave us wisdom and the ability to use this wisdom to both create and destroy,” said Tony Mitchell, who has a Ph.D. in science education and is a member of Grace United Methodist Church, Newburgh, N.Y. “I don't see how anyone can know the difference (or for that matter, the difference between good and evil) without both a foundation in science and faith.

 

“The most difficult challenge that anyone has is to see how their own faith plays out in the face of conflicts,” he said.

 

Ehrman puts it simply.

 

“I believe that what we do with our lives, who we influence, and the ways we make the world a better and more loving place are where we should focus our attention. I assume that God is more concerned with what I do with my life than what I think of the creation of man.” 

 

-By Kathy Gilbert

 

Related

It's time for people of faith to accept evolution

Originally Posted: Jun 7, 2011

Comments

Ouch. A very scary article on a website proclaiming itself to be part of the church of Jesus Christ. A few responses: 1. Evolution is incompatable with the Bible. Evolution presumes death before man evolved. The Bible says that through one man, Adam, came death. 2. If Genesis chapters 1 through 9 are not true, how can we trust the rest of the Bible? 3. If Jesus affirms the creation account, how can we? dare to deny it? 4. The church is the pillar of truth. ..."we must let go of the arrogance that only the church speaks for God.” God ordained that his truth be proclaimed through the church. It may or may not be arrogant that only the church speaks for God, but it is accurate. I've learned a lot from good websites like www.creation.com, www.desiringgod.org, and others. Question evolution. Evolution is “the central and radical lie in the whole web of falsehood that now governs our lives and modern civilization." - C. S. Lewis, 1951
http://www.answersingenesis.org/ Science is catching up to the Bible. Is it truly God's Word, or isn't it? Are those who are dying around the world for simply owning a copy not evidence enough that it is not simply a book written by man? To Ehrman's comment, I believe that what we do with the Word of God is where we should focus our attention - on Jesus and His Word. Those other things are outcomes, not inputs. Isaiah 66:2 reads, "For all those [things] My hand has made, And all those [things] exist," Says the LORD. "But on this [one] will I look: On [him who is] poor and of a contrite spirit, And who trembles at My word." Humble. Broken. Trembles at His Word. We need to either accept His Word - all of it - or throw it in the burn pile for kindling.